ÇàÄêɬµ¼º½

ÇàÄêɬµ¼º½ invites the campus community to visit this web portal for updates, guidance and information on state and federal legislation, executive orders and court rulings, and for how various actions will affect us. 

Here in Ohio, Senate Bill 1 (SB1 - The Advance Ohio Higher Education Act) aims to redirect many of the operations of state institutions of higher education in Ohio. Key changes include reducing the terms of office for trustees and mandating that state institutions, including ÇàÄêɬµ¼º½, make syllabi for undergraduate courses publicly available online to ensure transparency and accessibility.

The Act's authors emphasize what they see as the commitment to free and open intellectual inquiry by prohibiting the establishment or continuation of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) offices or training unless required for compliance with state or federal laws or accreditation. SB1 also introduces new guidance that will affect our academic offerings, such as a requirement for a three-credit-hour American civic literacy course and establishes guidelines for faculty workload, annual performance evaluations, and a post-tenure review process for tenured faculty.

Meanwhile in Washington, several executive orders provide new and immediate mandates on such issues as removing DEI from college campuses and guidance for research grants.

Latest News:

  • - OhioSenate.gov.
  • – Inter-University Council.
  • – Inside Higher Education.

From President Diacon:

‘We will follow the law but it won’t change our commitment to each member of our community’ - ‘Talking With Todd’ via ÇàÄêɬµ¼º½ Today.

Supporting ÇàÄêɬµ¼º½â€™s International Community – Campus Email

‘We’ve just become more efficient and effective’ - Speech to Greater Akron Chamber.

Note: President Diacon has provided updates on the legislation during several ‘Talking With Todd’ webcasts, archived on the President’s home page. He also addressed the impacts of SB1 during the President’s Advisory Council meeting on April 9.

The following ÇàÄêɬµ¼º½ discussions on SB1 have taken place to date:

Academic Affairs:

  • Provost Tankersley led a town hall discussion on Apr. 22, 2025

Research and Economic Development:

  • Vice President Delahanty led a town hall discussion on Apr. 8, 2025

Student Life:

  • Sr. Vice President Pringle led a town hall discussion on Apr. 17, 2025

Senate Bill 1 (SB1 - The Advance Ohio Higher Education Act)

This section updated: Apr. 16, 2025

Summary: SB1 was signed into law on March 28, 2025 and introduces significant reforms to enhance transparency, accountability, and excellence in Ohio's state institutions of higher education.

The following information reflects ÇàÄêɬµ¼º½â€™s understanding of SB1's implementation as of April 11, 2025. SB1 goes into effect at the end of June. The law requires our university to change various aspects of how we operate. We will remain true to our values and priorities, chief among them being our commitment to placing students first and maintaining a culture in which each individual experiences a sense of belonging and their needs are met.

Impacts of SB1:

Faculty
  1. What is the new policy regarding faculty strikes?
    1. Answer: No longer permitted to strike (full-time faculty).
  2. How has collective bargaining changed for faculty?
    1. Answer: Changes to collective bargaining: specified topics removed from negotiation for new agreements.
  3. Who will develop the new faculty workload standards?
    1. Answer: New faculty workload standards to be developed by the Chancellor of the Ohio Department of Higher Education and adopted by ÇàÄêɬµ¼º½â€™s Board of Trustees.
  4. What is the minimum weight of student evaluations in annual performance reviews?
    1. Answer: Mandatory student evaluations (minimum 25% weight) in annual performance reviews.
  5. What new policy will be developed regarding post-tenure review?
    1. Answer: Post-tenure review policy to be developed with specific requirements.
  6. When is the required syllabus content for all undergraduate courses due?
    1. Answer: Required syllabus content for all undergraduate courses by Fall 2026.
  7. Are faculty required to make DEI-related statements or declarations?
    1. Answer: Cannot be required to make DEI-related statements or declarations.
  8. Can institutions require faculty to endorse specific ideological or political views?
    1. Answer: Institutions cannot require faculty to endorse specific ideological or political views.
  9. How is academic freedom protected under the new law?
    1. Answer: Academic freedom protected: classroom discussions not intended to be affected.
  10. What is the potential impact on research funding?
    1. Answer: Potential impact on research funding (5 KSU projects already stopped based on executive orders).
Administrators
  1. What must administrators implement regarding DEI programs?
    1. Answer: Must implement prohibitions on DEI programs, offices, and initiatives.
  2. What new policies must administrators create and enforce?
    1. Answer: Required to create and enforce intellectual diversity policies.
  3. Can administrators create new DEI offices or use DEI criteria in job descriptions?
    1. Answer: Cannot create new DEI offices or use DEI criteria in job descriptions.
  4. How must administrators respond to complaints about intellectual diversity violations?
    1. Answer: Must respond to complaints about intellectual diversity violations.
  5. What new reporting requirements do administrators have?
    1. Answer: New reporting requirements to the Chancellor on multiple topics.
  6. What programs must administrators review or eliminate?
    1. Answer: Need to review/eliminate low-enrolled programs (fewer than 5 graduates annually).
  7. What new course must be developed by Fall 2026?
    1. Answer: Must develop a required American civics course by Fall 2026.
Board of Trustees
  1. What is the new term length for Board of Trustees members?
    1. Answer: Terms set at six years (down from nine).
  2. What are the new annual training requirements for the Board of Trustees?
    1. Answer: Annual training requirements (17 mandatory topics).
  3. What policies must the Board of Trustees adopt?
    1. Answer: Must adopt policies on faculty workload, evaluation, post-tenure review, tenure, and retrenchment.
  4. What must the Board of Trustees prohibit regarding DEI?
    1. Answer: Required to prohibit DEI training, offices, and activities.
  5. What must the Board of Trustees affirm regarding intellectual diversity?
    1. Answer: Must affirm intellectual diversity requirements.
  6. How often must the Board of Trustees review and update policies?
    1. Answer: Required to review and update policies every five years.
Students
  1. What new course requirement will be implemented for the Fall 2026 entering class?
    1. Answer: New civics course requirement for Fall 2026 entering class.
  2. How are student organizations protected under the new law?
    1. Answer: Continued protection for student organizations.
  3. Does the new law intend to restrict classroom discussions?
    1. Answer: Not intended to restrict classroom discussions.
  4. What is the institutional requirement regarding intellectual diversity in educational offerings?
    1. Answer: Institutional requirement to ensure intellectual diversity in educational offerings.
  5. What rights are protected for students under the new law?
    1. Answer: Protection for intellectual diversity rights.
Financial/Research Impact
  1. What is the potential consequence for the university if it fails to comply with DEI prohibitions?
    1. Answer: Potential withholding of state funding if university fails to comply with DEI prohibitions.
  2. What new reporting requirement is introduced for financial operations?
    1. Answer: New five-year rolling cost summary reporting requirement.
International Relations
  1. What restrictions are placed on partnerships with Chinese institutions?
    1. Answer: Restrictions on partnerships with Chinese institutions.
  2. What new reporting requirements are there for Chinese academic partnerships?
    1. Answer: New reporting requirements for Chinese academic partnerships.
  3. What is the new policy on gifts from the Chinese government or its agents?
    1. Answer: Ban on gifts from Chinese government or its agents.

2025 Federal Executive Orders and Actions Affecting Higher Education by Stakeholder Group

This section updated: Apr. 16, 2025

Impacts of Federal Executive Orders:

Institutional Leadership & Administration
  1. Anti-DEI Executive Order (01/21/25): Directs all federal agencies to end DEI preferences, mandates, policies, programs, and activities
  2. Rescission of EO 11246: Eliminates requirement for federal contractors to have affirmative action plans
  3. OMB Memo on Grant Pause (01/29/25): Temporarily paused and reviewed all external funding to ensure alignment with administration policies
  4. SFFA Guidance Letter (02/14/25): Clarifies that federal law prohibits race-based decisions in all aspects of campus life
  5. Foreign Aid Reevaluation (01/20/25): 90-day pause on foreign development assistance, affecting international programs
  6. America First Investment Policy (02/21/25): Restricts university endowment investments, specifically targeting connections to China
  7. Deregulation Order (01/31/25): Requires elimination of 10 regulations for each new one, affecting regulatory compliance
  8. Cost Efficiency Initiatives (02/26/25): Requires justification for payments under federal contracts and grants
Faculty & Research
  1. NIH Indirect Cost Rate Cap (02/07/25): Imposed 15% cap on indirect costs for NIH-funded research (temporarily blocked by courts)
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Rate Cap (04/11/2025): Imposed 15% cap on indirect costs for DOE funded research (a temporary restraining order was recently issued)
  3. Immigration & Foreign Faculty Screening (01/20/25): Increased vetting for international faculty and researchers
  4. Anti-DEI and Foreign Research Restrictions: Multiple orders limiting DEI initiatives in research grants
  5. Grant Justification Requirements (02/26/25): New requirements for written justifications prior to grant payment approvals
  6. China-Related Research Restrictions: Increased scrutiny of partnerships with Chinese academic institutions
  7. The proposed cap on F&A (indirect costs): 15% proposed but not yet in effect.
Students
  1. Title IX Reinterpretation (01/20/25): "Defending Women from Gender Ideology" order redefines sex-based protections
  2. Women's Sports Order (02/05/25): Prohibits transgender women from participating in women's sports at federally funded institutions
  3. COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Ban (02/15/25): Prohibits use of federal funds for institutions requiring COVID vaccination
  4. Public Service Loan Forgiveness Revisions (03/07/25): Restricts eligibility for certain organizations
  5. Immigration Enforcement: Increased immigration enforcement affecting international students and "sanctuary" policies
Faculty
  1. DEI Program Elimination Order (01/20/25): Mandates elimination of all DEI and "diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility" programs
  2. Rescission of Equity-Focused EOs: Revoked 78 Biden-era executive orders, including those supporting underrepresented students
  3. HSI Initiative Cancellation: Ended White House initiative for Hispanic-Serving Institutions
  4. Title VI Enforcement Shift: Refocused on antisemitism enforcement while reducing other civil rights enforcement areas
Financial Operations
  1. Endowment Scrutiny: Mandated investigations of institutions with endowments of at least $1 billion
  2. Foreign Investment Restrictions: Limitations on university endowment investments related to China
  3. Funding Review for "Sanctuary" Policies: Restrictions on federal funding for institutions with "sanctuary" policies
  4. Grant Payment System Changes: New mandatory justification fields for grant payment requests
International Programs
  1. Foreign Travel Restrictions: Non-essential travel requiring justification
  2. China Partnership Limitations: Restrictions on academic partnerships with Chinese institutions
  3. Foreign Student Monitoring: Enhanced monitoring of international students
  4. Fulbright Program Disruptions: Cancellation of Fulbright exchanges

Supreme Court: Affirmative Action

This section updated: Jul. 1, 2023

Summary: On June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the long-standing policy of affirmative action in college admissions on the grounds it violates the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. 

FAQs for Supreme Court: Affirmative Action:

Student Affirmative Action FAQs

How does the court's ruling on affirmative action impact my programs and classes?

Answer: This change in affirmative action does not affect your programs or classes.

Does this mean there will be fewer minority students enrolled at ÇàÄêɬµ¼º½?

Answer: ÇàÄêɬµ¼º½ will continue its commitment to attract, support and graduate a diverse student population.

Will I still have to include my race on surveys and other university questionnaires?

Answer: Yes.

Faculty Affirmative Action FAQs

How does the court's ruling on affirmative action impact what I’m teaching in the classroom?

Answer: This change to affirmative action does not affect what you are teaching in the classroom.

Does this mean there will be fewer minority students enrolled in my courses?

Answer: ÇàÄêɬµ¼º½ will continue its commitment to attract, support and graduate a diverse student population

How does this change impact faculty reviews and/or hiring?

Answer: The change does not impact faculty reviews and/or hiring.

Staff Affirmative Action FAQs

How does the court's ruling on affirmative action impact how the university recruits and admits new students?

Answer: ÇàÄêɬµ¼º½ does not use race for the purposes of admission to the university. ÇàÄêɬµ¼º½ remains committed to assisting students with gaining access to higher education.

Supreme Court: Student Loan Forgiveness

This section updated: Apr. 16, 2025

Summary: On June 30, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked President Joe Biden’s plan to cancel $430 billion in student loan debt on the grounds that the program was an unlawful exercise of presidential power because it had not been explicitly approved by Congress.